BICYCLE HELMET
RESEARCH
FOUNDATION

cyclehelmets.org


Home page

Main topics
News Headlines

Frequently asked Questions
For Policy Makers

Research evidence
Misleading claims
Helmet laws
Analysis

Search Engine

Australia
Canada
New Zealand
UK
USA
Other countries

Full index
Links


BHRF
Policy statement
Register as a supporter
Feedback

Download this page

Cycle helmet effectiveness in New Zealand

Povey LJ, Frith WJ, Graham PG. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1999 Nov;31(6):763-70

Original paper

 

Summary of original paper

This paper considers the effect of helmet wearing on hospital admissions for head injury from 1990 to 1996, using cyclist limb injuries as a proxy for exposure. Cycle helmet wearing became compulsory in New Zealand from January 1994. The authors conclude that the relatively large increase in helmet wearing following the law reduced head injuries by 24% - 32% in non-motor vehicle crashes, and by 20% in motor vehicle crashes. No change in the severity of head injuries over this period could be detected.

BHRF Commentary

A detailed criticism of this paper, published in a subsequent issue of Accident Analysis and Prevention (Robinson, 2001), needs to be considered when assessing the original paper.  The author explains:

The pre-law increase in adults wearing helmets (from 30% in 1990 to 43% in 1993) was accompanied by a fall of 45 head injuries per 100 limb injuries (i.e. -3.47 for every 1% increase in helmet wearing) compared to a fall of just 11 head injuries when helmet wearing increased from 43% to 93% with the law (-0.23 for every 1% increase in wearing). Unless voluntary wearing is 15 times more effective in reducing head injuries, it seems likely that the claimed 20% - 32% falls in head injuries with increased helmet wearing were, in reality, an artefact caused by failure to fit time trends in their model.

Inconsistency of effects over periods of substantial change, compared with periods of little change in helmet wearing, may be a useful indicator of the presence of trends. Because the large increases in wearing with helmet laws did not result in any obvious change over and above existing trends, helmet laws and major helmet promotion campaigns are likely to prove less beneficial and less cost effective than proven road-safety measures, such as enforcement of speed limits and drink-driving laws, education of motorists and cyclists and treatment of accident black spots and known hazards for cyclists.

References

Robinson, 2001

Robinson DL, 2001. Changes in head injury with the New Zealand bicycle helmet law. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2001 Sep;33(5):687-91.