BICYCLE HELMET
RESEARCH
FOUNDATION
cyclehelmets.org
Home page
Main topics
News Headlines
Frequently asked Questions
For Policy Makers
Research evidence
Misleading claims
Helmet laws
Analysis
Search Engine
Australia
Canada
New Zealand
UK
USA
Other countries
Full index
Links
BHRF
Policy statement
Alcohol more significant than helmets in determining head injury
A study in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine has failed to "find signific
read more ...
Alcohol, bicycling, and head and brain injury: a study of impaired cyclists' riding patterns
Crocker P, Zad O, Milling T, Lawson KA. Amer J Emer Med 2010;28(1):68-72
This study finds no significant link between helmet use and head injury, despite an apparent goal of doing so. It does, however, find clear and unpredicted evidence of a link between alcohol use and head and brain injury, which could be of significance much greater than the authors appear to realise.
Bias and conflict of interest in older pro-helmet research
Rune Elvik, from the Norwegian Institute of Transport Economics, uses the latest methodologies to identify bias and conflict of interest in older helmet research that has greatly exaggerated the benefits. Analysing more recent studies, any benefit vanishes entirely.
Errors and omissions in Canadian research group's bicycle helmet papers
Frequently cited research regarding the effect of helmet laws on cycle use does not stand up to scrutiny
Cycle helmets are the subject of many myths and exaggerations which are often used to promote helmet use and laws
Reviews of papers that are fundamentally flawed and in which the data sometimes provides good evidence for an opposite conclusion to that advanced by the authors.
BBC Radio investigated growing concerns about the poor quality of much peer-reviewed research. There are strong parallels in research concerned with cycle helmets.